Make vs Zapier

A 2026 side-by-side comparison of Make and Zapier — pricing, key features, platforms, API access, and the trade-offs of each, based on data collected from their official sites.

Tagline

Visual automation platform with AI building blocks

Automate work across 7,000+ apps with AI

Pricing

Freemium
Freemium

Rating

0.0 (0)
0.0 (0)

Platforms

Web
WebChrome

API

Yes
Yes

Open source

No
No

Description

Make (formerly Integromat) lets you visually build automations across 1,500+ apps.

Zapier connects your apps and adds AI actions, agents, and chatbots to any workflow.

Key features

  • Human-in-the-loop
  • Self-hostable
  • Evals
  • Guardrails
  • Self-hostable

Pros

  • Visual scenario builder
  • 1,500+ integrations
  • Complex branching logic
  • Rich data manipulation modules
  • Affordable vs Zapier
  • Custom apps builder
  • Enterprise features
  • Detailed run logs
  • 7,000+ app integrations
  • No-code interface
  • Built-in AI actions
  • Multi-step workflows
  • Huge template library
  • Team collaboration
  • Highly reliable execution
  • Extensive documentation

Cons

  • Steeper learning curve than Zapier
  • Operations-based pricing
  • Debugging complex scenarios is hard
  • UI can be overwhelming
  • Occasional module bugs
  • Mobile app is limited
  • Limited custom code nodes
  • Some triggers polling only
  • Task-based pricing gets expensive
  • Slower than coded alternatives
  • Limited advanced logic
  • Debugging can be painful
  • Many triggers are polling only
  • Free tier restrictive
  • Enterprise features gated
  • Overkill for simple tasks

Pricing plans

Not disclosed
  • Free to buildUSD0
    • Gain access to Zapier Partner Program benefits
    • Tap into millions of existing users
    • Instantly connect your product to 9,000+ popular apps

Which one should you pick?

  • Choose Make if you need Human-in-the-loop.
  • Choose Zapier if you need Evals.
  • On budget: Make is freemium, Zapier is freemium.