XCrawl vs Make

A 2026 side-by-side comparison of XCrawl and Make — pricing, key features, platforms, API access, and the trade-offs of each, based on data collected from their official sites.

Tagline

AI-ready web scraping API converting websites into structured JSON, Markdown, HTML, and screenshots with built-in proxy rotation.

Visual automation platform with AI building blocks

Pricing

Freemium
Freemium

Rating

0.0 (0)
0.0 (0)

Platforms

WebCross-platform
Web

API

Yes
Yes

Open source

No
No

Description

XCrawl is a powerful REST-based web scraping API designed for developers and AI workflows. It seamlessly extracts clean, structured JSON and Markdown from any webpage, handles JavaScript-heavy content using headless browsers, and bypasses blocks with built-in proxy rotation. Additionally, it offers automated multi-page crawling, SERP data extraction, and deep integrations with automation and AI platforms like n8n, Zapier, and Claude's Model Context Protocol (MCP).

Make (formerly Integromat) lets you visually build automations across 1,500+ apps.

Key features

  • Headless browser rendering
  • Structured JSON output
  • AI-ready Markdown conversion
  • HTML and screenshot capture
  • Built-in rotating proxies
  • Multi-page crawling with depth control
  • SERP data extraction
  • Claude Model Context Protocol (MCP) support
  • n8n and Zapier integrations
  • Official Python SDK
  • Official Node.js and TypeScript SDK
  • Human-in-the-loop
  • Self-hostable

Pros

  • Every new account includes 1,000 free credits with no credit card required to start testing.
  • Supports headless browser rendering to seamlessly load and scrape JavaScript-heavy, dynamic websites.
  • Provides multiple clean output options including JSON, AI-ready Markdown, raw HTML, and screenshots.
  • Features built-in proxy rotation to bypass access restrictions and anti-scraping blocks automatically.
  • Allows intelligent multi-page crawling across full domains or sections with reliable depth control.
  • Extracts structured SERP data from search engines like Google to power SEO and market analysis.
  • Integrates smoothly with AI workflows and agents via MCP for Claude, Zapier, Make, and n8n.
  • Offers official SDKs for Python and Node.js/TypeScript alongside examples for Go, Ruby, PHP, and cURL.
  • Visual scenario builder
  • 1,500+ integrations
  • Complex branching logic
  • Rich data manipulation modules
  • Affordable vs Zapier
  • Custom apps builder
  • Enterprise features
  • Detailed run logs

Cons

  • Credit consumption rates vary based on request complexity, meaning advanced scraping uses credits faster.
  • No official graphical user interface (GUI) or desktop application was mentioned on the site.
  • Official SDKs are limited to Python and Node.js/TypeScript; other languages rely on direct REST API integration.
  • The exact credit consumption table for different request types is not detailed on the main pricing page.
  • No compliance certifications such as SOC2, ISO, or HIPAA are explicitly listed in the available pages.
  • Steeper learning curve than Zapier
  • Operations-based pricing
  • Debugging complex scenarios is hard
  • UI can be overwhelming
  • Occasional module bugs
  • Mobile app is limited
  • Limited custom code nodes
  • Some triggers polling only

Pricing plans

  • Free TrialUSD0/one_time
    • • 1,000 free credits to start
    • • Structured JSON, Markdown, or screenshot output
    • • Built-in proxies and anti-bot evasion
  • Scale Plans—
    • • Higher rate limits
    • • More concurrent browsers
    • • Priority dedicated support
Not disclosed

Which one should you pick?

  • Choose XCrawl if you need Headless browser rendering.
  • Choose Make if you need Human-in-the-loop.
  • On budget: XCrawl is freemium, Make is freemium.