Zapier vs Make

A 2026 side-by-side comparison of Zapier and Make — pricing, key features, platforms, API access, and the trade-offs of each, based on data collected from their official sites.

Tagline

Automate work across 7,000+ apps with AI

Visual automation platform with AI building blocks

Pricing

Freemium
Freemium

Rating

0.0 (0)
0.0 (0)

Platforms

WebChrome
Web

API

Yes
Yes

Open source

No
No

Description

Zapier connects your apps and adds AI actions, agents, and chatbots to any workflow.

Make (formerly Integromat) lets you visually build automations across 1,500+ apps.

Key features

  • Evals
  • Guardrails
  • Self-hostable
  • Human-in-the-loop
  • Self-hostable

Pros

  • 7,000+ app integrations
  • No-code interface
  • Built-in AI actions
  • Multi-step workflows
  • Huge template library
  • Team collaboration
  • Highly reliable execution
  • Extensive documentation
  • Visual scenario builder
  • 1,500+ integrations
  • Complex branching logic
  • Rich data manipulation modules
  • Affordable vs Zapier
  • Custom apps builder
  • Enterprise features
  • Detailed run logs

Cons

  • Task-based pricing gets expensive
  • Slower than coded alternatives
  • Limited advanced logic
  • Debugging can be painful
  • Many triggers are polling only
  • Free tier restrictive
  • Enterprise features gated
  • Overkill for simple tasks
  • Steeper learning curve than Zapier
  • Operations-based pricing
  • Debugging complex scenarios is hard
  • UI can be overwhelming
  • Occasional module bugs
  • Mobile app is limited
  • Limited custom code nodes
  • Some triggers polling only

Pricing plans

  • Free to buildUSD0
    • Gain access to Zapier Partner Program benefits
    • Tap into millions of existing users
    • Instantly connect your product to 9,000+ popular apps
Not disclosed

Which one should you pick?

  • Choose Zapier if you need Evals.
  • Choose Make if you need Human-in-the-loop.
  • On budget: Zapier is freemium, Make is freemium.